Rendered at 08:56:30 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
unixhero 2 days ago [-]
And the IPO valuation rises
Dig1t 2 days ago [-]
ULA uses expendable rockets. From an environmental perspective and also just a basic efficiency perspective this is a no-brainer.
If the Air Force were flying cargo across the country why would we want them to be using cargo planes that get destroyed after a single use?
bell-cot 2 days ago [-]
Might anyone have a view under the hood here, and not be under NDA, to comment on why ULA hasn't replaced Northrop Grumman with a less failure-prone SRB supplier?
LarsAlereon 2 days ago [-]
I can't think of any other remaining large solid rocket manufacturer in the USA, NG bought them all.
eugenekay 2 days ago [-]
They would have to admit that they were wrong to switch away from using the proven Aerojet-Rocketdyne AJ-60A boosters (developed for and still flying with the Atlas V family).
If the Air Force were flying cargo across the country why would we want them to be using cargo planes that get destroyed after a single use?